Name
Email
Subject
Message
If this form should not work but return an error message, please try clicking [SUBMIT] again or send us an email or use the
alternate form
! (apologies for the inconvenience, which is caused by a WordPress-bug)
Comments are closed.
Languages
English
Français
Nederlands
Deutsch
Italiano
Español
News
Dedication
About us
↓
Intro
Contact Us
Media Contacts
Panel Members
Honorary Members
What is “Best Evidence?”
Methodology
The 9/11 Consensus Points
↓
General Points
↓
Point G-1
A Claim Regarding Osama bin Laden
Point G-2
A Claim that there was No Insider Trading in Put Options before September 11, 2001
Twin Towers
↓
Point TT-1
A Claim about the Destruction of the Twin Towers: Impact, Jet Fuel, and Fire Only
Point TT-2
A Claim about the Destruction of the Twin Towers: Impact, Fire, and Gravity Only
Point TT-3
A Claim Excluding Explosions in the Twin Towers
Point TT-4
A Second Claim Excluding Explosives in the Twin Towers
Point TT-5
The Claim that the World Trade Center Dust Contained No Thermitic Materials
Point TT-6
The Claim That There Was No Molten Steel or Iron in the WTC Buildings
Point TT-7
Why Did the Twin Towers Collapse? The Seismic Evidence
Point TT-8
Why Did the Twin Towers Collapse? The Physical and Testimonial Evidence
Point TT-9
The Claim of Widespread Infernos in the South Tower vs the FDNY Radio Transcript
Building WTC 7
↓
Point WTC7-1
The Claim that WTC 7 Collapsed from Fire Alone
Point WTC7-2
The Claim in NIST’s Draft Report that WTC 7 Did Not Come Down at Free Fall Acceleration
Point WTC7-3
The Claim in NIST’s Final Report that WTC 7 Came Down in Free Fall Without Explosives
Point WTC7-4
Did the Official Simulation of the Fall of WTC-7 Match the Observed Collapse?
Point WTC7-5
World Trade Center Building 7: NIST’s Analysis of the Collapse Initiation Is Not Valid
Point WTC7-6
The Fraudulent NIST Claim That There Was No Steel Recovered from Building WTC7 for Analysis
Point WTC7-7
Foreknowledge of the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7
Point WTC7-8
The Omission of Evidence that Barry Jennings and Michael Hess Experienced an Explosion in WTC7 the Morning of 9/11
Pentagon
↓
Point Pent-1
Why the Attack on the Pentagon Was Not Prevented: The First Official Account
Point Pent-2
Why the Attack on the Pentagon Was Not Prevented: The Second Official Account
Point Pent-3
The Claim Regarding Hani Hanjour as Flight 77 Pilot
Point Pent-4
Was There Foreknowledge by Officials that the Pentagon would be attacked?
Flights
↓
Point Flt-1
A Claim Regarding Hijacked Passenger Jets
Point Flt-2
The Claim that Flight 93 Crashed Near Shanksville, Pennsylvania
Point Flt-3
Were Hijackers Responsible for Changes to September 11 Flight Transponders?
Point Flt-4
Unexplained Black Box Anomalies for the Four 9/11 Planes
Military Exercises
↓
Point ME-1
Did Military Exercises Show that the Military was Prepared for Domestic (as Well as Foreign) Hijackings?
Point ME-2
The Claim that the Military Exercises Did Not Delay the Response to the 9/11 Attacks
Military and Political Commands
↓
Point MC-Intro
Overview of Contradicted Claims about Key Military and Political Leaders
Point MC-1
Why Was President Bush Not Hustled Away from the Florida School?
Point MC-2
The White House Claim as to How Long President Bush Remained in the Florida Classroom
Point MC-3
The Claim about the Time of Dick Cheney’s Entry into the White House Bunker
Point MC-4
When Did Cheney Authorize the Shoot-down of Civilian Planes?
Point MC-5
Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld’s Behavior Between 9:00 and 10:00 AM
Point MC-6
The Activities of General Richard Myers during the 9/11 Attacks
Point MC-7
The Time of General Shelton’s Return to his Command
Point MC-8
The Activities of Brigadier General Montague Winfield between 8:30 and 10:30 AM
Point MC-9
The Activities of General Ralph Eberhart during the 9/11 Attacks
Point MC-10
The Activities of NYC Mayor Giuliani on September 11, 2001
Hijackers
↓
Point H-1
Mohamed Atta’s Mysterious Trip to Portland
Point H-2
The Claim that ‘Able Danger’ Failed to Identify Mohamed Atta’s probable Presence in the US in January 2000
Point H-3
The Claim that the Hijackers Were Devout Muslims
Point H-4
The Claim that Mohamed Atta Had Become a Fanatically Religious Muslim
Phone Calls
↓
Point PC-1
The Alleged Calls of Todd Beamer, Flight UA 93
Point PC-1A
The Todd Beamer Call from UA Flight 93: A Serious Problem in the Timeline
Point PC-2
The Reported Phone Calls from Barbara Olson
Point PC-3
Point PC-3: Cell Phone Calls from the Planes: The First Official Account
Point PC-4
Cell Phone Calls from the Planes: The Second Official Account
Video Evidence
↓
Point Video-1
The Alleged Security Videos of Mohamed Atta during a Mysterious Trip to Portland, Maine, September 10-11, 2001
Point Video-2
Was the Airport Video of the Alleged AA 77 Hijackers Authentic? Official 9/11 Videotaped Evidence
Archived News
Press Releases
References, Evidence-Based
Links
search in current language:
Donate to Consensus 911
Donation Amount:
( USD)
Please report any errors, omissions or suggestions for improvements to
consensus911 (@) gmail.com
